"To be persuasive we must be believable; to be believable we must be credible;
to be credible we must be truthful." - Edward R Murrow
Showing posts with label editorial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label editorial. Show all posts

Editorial: Sexual Education by Nikky Raney





This is an editorial I wrote for Ed Rice's Editorial and Column Writing Class. I got an A on it - so I thought it was worth posting. P.S. I'll have more posts in two weeks once school is done.


Written By Nikky Raney


Abstinence only education is better than no sexual education at all - there are parents who argue that they should be teaching their children about sex and not the schools. Well, for those parents who neglected to give their children that information they don't need to worry - the nurse's office has many different flavored latex condoms and has lots of pamphlets about al kinds of sex. That's definitely the best way to go about sexual education.


There are public elementary schools and middle schools around the country that teach students about sexual education, but once the students reach the high school level many schools do not give any classes about sexual education.


Well, when students are only getting educated about sexual education before entering high school it isn't surprising that in a study done by the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) it was reported that approximately 750,000 teen pregnancies occur each year; more than half end in abortion.


United States has one of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the developed world which is reported to be more than twice as in Canada. Along with this over nine million new sexually transmitted diseases occur among young adults and teens.



In 2006-2008 93 percent of teens aged 15-19 were taught about aids and 84 percent taught about abstinence, but one-third of the teens had not received any formal instruction about contraceptives - when people like Sarah Palin are pushing for abstinence only education it's no wonder that her daughter ended up as a statistic for teen pregnancies. Among teens aged 18-19 41 percent reported knowing little to nothing about condoms and 75 percent knew nothing about other contraceptives.


Sexual education isn't the same as schools teaching about evolution - sexual education is something that everyone needs to know about. It shouldn't be limited to learning the body parts and having worksheets where the student needs to label each part of the genitalia. It might be great to know where the epididymus is or the cowpers gland, but it would probably be a good thing to know what herpes is.


There are three federal programs for teens that are given a yearly budget in the millions, but there are still only 20 states that mandate sex education and only 12 mandate HIV education; there aren't many parents who can teach a child about aids in a way that is credible and comprehensive. There is evidence that young people who are educated about sex are less likely to feel pressured to have sex too soon and less likely to become sexually active.


Parents aren't going to be able to teach their kids about all the sexually transmitted diseases or about contraceptives, and with this explicit and obscene world there is no way to hide sex, because sex happens. Especially now more than ever as statistics have shown - sex is happening, and with shows on MTV like 16 and Pregnant it's surprising that more parents aren't trying to do more about it.

Read Users' Comments (0)

Putting the TWIT in TWITTER

Don't let your 140 character limit on Twitter updates compromise your intelligence.



Okay, I think that there needs to be some new rules that dictate to public figures that just because you have a twitter/facebook does not mean that you should "dumb down" your speech. I am appalled that it has become socially acceptable (or appears to have become) for politicians to write that way online. I have an example from Sarah Palin's official twitter.


"Earth saw clmate chnge4 ions;will cont 2 c chnges.R duty2responsbly devlop resorces4humankind/not pollute&destroy;but cant alter naturl change" **

http://twitter.com/SarahPalinUSA/status/6823906156


That is her exact tweet. I have not altered, changed, or edited anything from the original tweet.


Since when is it acceptable to write this way? For those of you who will argue against me and say that it's "easier" or "Twitter's 140-character limit makes it difficult," that should not matter. Either shorten your tweet to 140 characters OR make multiple tweets. She could have made two separate tweets and got the message across.


Who is the target audience here? I had my 60-year-old father read this tweet. He struggled to read it out loud, and he was very frustrated while trying to understand what she was trying to say. If the target audience for her twitter are other adults, then she may have a problem. I asked some of my friends (college-aged) to read the tweet, and most of them also struggled.


I think that writing in such a way does not promote literacy or clarity. I don't think that as a politician, on her public (not personal/private), Twitter, she should be writing in a way that misrepresents her intelligence.


I think that it seems rushed and careless. I don't even make my Twitter that way, and my Twitter is a personal "request only" account.


I have done research and noticed that I am not the only one to give criticism to Sarah Palin. Other criticism includes

"TWITTER ACCOUNT OF A 9 YEAR OLD"


I am not intentionally attacking or "dissing" Sarah Palin for the way she uses her Twitter. I am simply using her as an example of what I have seen on Twitter that I believe is not acceptable. I do not think I am alone in my opinion. I jokingly said to my aunt in an e-mail, "She puts the TWIT in TWITTER," and that is what inspired this blog entry.


Thanks for reading, cheers.


One last note regarding Twitter: My twitter is http://www.twitter.com/nikkyraney , I follow those who follow me, and I believe it is good to be following more people than are following you (unless you are a big time celebrity without the time for all that), because I think via Twitter LISTENING is more important than being heard. Twitter helps me gain information from others and I use it to mostly post articles & news related information. I like to follow a variety of people, and I think the more people you follow, the more information you can obtain. Twitter is extremely simplistic, but used in the proper way it can be a great tool for promotion and for news.




**does she mean EONS?





"Here's a little newsflash for those reporters and commentators: I'm not going to Washington to seek their good opinion. I'm going to Washington to serve this great country." - Sarah Palin

Bloggist? Journalogger? Drawing the line between journalists and bloggers.

Bloggist? Journalogger? Drawing the line between journalists and bloggers.


Editorial By: Nikky Raney



I turned on my television and saw Perez Hilton hosting “The Bad Girl’s Club Reunion” on Oxygen. . He then introduces himself as a “celebrity gossip columnist. My jaw dropped and I could not believe what I heard. Hilton of PerezHilton.com writes news about celebrities on his blog and uses digital paint to draw things on celebrity photos. He occasionally posts the link where he found the article and he always inserts his opinion. Ironically, he will always post the link where he obtained the images he defaced, but he is not as concerned with posting the link where obtained his news. Hilton is one of the many bloggers on the Internet claiming to be columnists and citizen journalists. When is blogger considered a journalist?
Most bloggers, like Hilton, obtain news from other sources and then put in their own comments and analysis. I would consider that as someone doing a review of the news and relaying the news to others, which is something that many people do in order to let other know about the news. This is done verbally without the person calling him or herself a columnist, but when Hilton creates a blog, copy and pastes news from a source, and then gives his opinion, he considers himself a columnist? Wouldn’t that make anyone who has ever showed an article to someone else and then given commentary about the article a columnist?
go to the web site to read rest
Contemplating between "bloggists" and "journaloggers"
Contemplating between "bloggists" and "journaloggers"

VISITOR COUNT