I am currently a student at New England School of Communications with a concentration of print and web journalism. I was editor of NESCom and; Husson University's campus paper during the first semester of my freshman year. I was previously the managing editor of largest broadsheet student run newspaper in New England, The Tide. As for work non-related to school, I was a paid freelance bi-weekly columnist for Fosters Daily Democrat in 2008. I am a fan of Hunter S. Thompson, Anderson Cooper, Fareed Zakaria, and others. I want to be an investigative journalist and an editor as my future career. I read and research a lot. I always read a variety of news from a variety of sources. I do not limit myself to any specific topic, but the topics that I am most interested in would be politics, crime & controversial issues. I keep myself up-to-date with all news: international, political, health, environmental, sports, crime, education, celebrity, entertainment, technology, business, etc. My posts are done from my personal 13" 2010 Macbook Pro (early 20th birthday present).
Posted in | at 4:33 PM
Posted in | at 12:31 PM
[caption id="attachment_9006" align="alignnone" width="723" caption="This is what I show teachers for why I am not speaking"][/caption]
In honor of this day I am going to post the front page article I wrote my junior year as news editor of The Tide.
From The Tide online:
Speak Out for Silence: May 11, 2007
By: Nikky Raney
On April 18, 2007, Dover High School, along with schools across the nation,
participated in the tenth annual National Day of Silence, a community action initiative aimed at ending discrimination against homosexuals.
Meanwhile, a nationwide pro-family and anti-homosexual coalition, www.NotOurKids.com, warned parents in a nationally distributed press release not to allow their children to attend school on what it called “Gay Day.” It's an effort, the group says, to protect "America's youth and [educate] parents about the dangers of homosexual activism and indoctrination in America's public schools.''
The National Day of Silence (NDS) was founded by students at the Virginia University and has been a tradition every third Wednesday in April for a decade. NDS is a nationwide protest against discrimination of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people. According to the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) in the year 2006, over 4,000 junior high schools, high schools, and colleges participated in the event.
“The teachers respect students’ choice to participate,” Mr. Strickland, DHS Art
Teacher, explains. “As teachers, we cannot participate, but everyone participates in their own way. Our school has a lot more freedom than others.”
Students who wish to participate are given pass cards to show their teachers, which read: "Please understand my reasons for not speaking today. I am participating in the Day of Silence, a national youth movement protesting the silence faced by lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender people and their allies in schools. My deliberate silence
echoes that silence, which is caused by harassment, prejudice, and discrimination. I
believe that ending the silence is the first step toward fighting these injustices.
Think about the voices you are not hearing today. What are you going to do to end the
Other schools, such as Saint Thomas Aquinas (STA), Berwick Academy and other private schools, also allow their students to participate in the nationwide event.
"The day was very well supported by those who participated in it. The Day of Silence accomplished what it was set out to accomplish,” according to Gail LeClair, Saint Thomas Guidance Counselor. “Silence gets a lot of attention," she continued. "We have never had so many students feel so comfortable and open." However, not all local parochial schools support the program.
“Private schools only have to follow the academic requirements,” says Edward Murdough, Administration for the Bureau of School Approval and Facility Management in NH, describing the differences between public schools and private schools and parochial schools like Seacoast Christian Academy (SCA) and Portsmouth Christian Academy (PCA), who will not allow students to participate.
When asked about Day of Silence involvement at SCA, Seacoast Christian board member
Fenton Groen simply said, “I don’t think anyone would choose to participate in that.”
SCA has not had to punish any students for their participation, because as of this printing, the SCA student body has not attempted participation.
Portsmouth Christian Academy, which also discourages student involvement in The Day of Silence, is the largest Christian school in New England. A PCA school board member, who wished to remain anonymous, gave reasons to why they punish students for participating saying, “The [parochial] school is for kids to learn without distractions and glorification of sins. The National Day of Prayer is May 3, 2007 and we encourage our kids to participate in that. Prayer is something that does not harm anyone,” the source continued, “and unlike the ‘gay silence day’ it does not advocate any sins. There are people trying to turn discrimination of sexual orientation into a hate crime, and that is the fault of public schools allowing and accepting sins.”
Mitchell Kissack, a freshman at Dover High School and former PCA student said of his National Day of Silence experience in 2006 at PCA: “It’s really personal for me. Last year I tried to participate, but my teachers would not let me.” Kissack, a staunch supporter of the NDS program, was stuck. “They said I would have to talk or I would be in trouble”
But The Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network is afraid that the wrong idea may be getting out to the media. Eliza Byard, deputy executive director of GLSEN, writes on the organization’s website that it is unfortunate that parents would decide to go along with the NotOurKids campaign. “In terms of its fundamental core message, the Day of Silence is about stopping name-calling, bullying and harassment based on actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity expression. It's about changing behavior, not necessarily changing beliefs,'' explains Byard.
In response to the growing success of the National Day of Silence event, the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), a right-wing Christian religious lobbying group, has termed the following day, “The Day of Truth.” According the ADF, “The Day of Truth was established to counter what the promotion of the homosexual agenda and express an opposing viewpoint from a Christian perspective.” Supporters believe that schools allowing The National Day of Silence should also allow The Day of Truth activities. ADF argues that students have only heard a “one-sided message.”
The group also sees a legal concern saying, “For a school to allow the [Day of Silence] and not the [Day of Truth] would be viewpoint discrimination, which is impermissible under any circumstances. The courts have unanimously struck down any restrictions based on viewpoint discrimination."
The card that Day of Truth participants passed out this year read, "I am speaking the Truth to break the silence. I believe in equal treatment for all, and not special rights for a
few. I believe in loving my neighbor, but part of that love means not condoning
detrimental personal and social behavior. I believe that by boldly proclaiming the
Truth, hurts will be halted, hearts will be healed, and lives will be saved.”
The true controversy of these two days is that they are both trying to achieve the same goal—the right to speak out, free of censorship, and support a position about the discrimination against homosexuals—but when does censorship on the part of school administrations cancel out discrimination on the part of groups? Next April, we may just find out.
Posted in | at 2:00 PM
Post originally from Zennie62
A lot of time, thought and effort went into this post. So please read it.
The most annoying thing will be that before even reading this post some people are going to automatically go into the mind state that the only thing Planned Parenthood does is use tax payer's money to pay for abortions. Please continue reading, because there is a lot more to it.
How fitting, after doing a post about how the teen pregnancy rate has lowered there is now a big issue with what will happen to Planned Parenthood if the Government Shutdown occurs.
On CBS News there was a tagline that said: Defund Abortion Providers.
Really? That is not all Planned Parenthood is.
CBS reports that 75 percent of Planned Parenthood clients are living close to the poverty line. The lack of funding or cutting the program all together could lead to terrible things; people need to NOT just associate Planned Parenthood with abortions:
"Planned Parenthood provides a wide array of medical services including reproductive health care, cancer screenings, and STD testing at more than 800 locations across the country. They are also the country's largest abortion provider."
Yes. It is the country's largest abortion provider and federal government funding abortion is not something that every Pro-Choice person agrees with; so put aside the fact that Planned Parenthood is mostly known for abortions and yes, the funding for Planned Parenthood indeed does go to abortions.
CBS continues to talk about those on the right who are opposed to government funding Planned Parenthood. What it should be saying is that there are a lot of Conservatives who are Pro-Life and think that all Planned Parenthood does is take tax-payer's money and have them pay for abortions. No, that's not it.
The CBS report emphasizes on that:
Republican lawmakers have questioned government funding of Planned Parenthood, saying the government shouldn't be in the business of supporting abortion - even indirectly. Planned Parenting receives government support, though the funds are used for purposes other than abortions.
As the article goes on it continues to talk about abortion:
"For all the controversy, abortion remains a common procedure in the U.S. A long-term decline in the abortion rate stalled between 2005 and 2008, according to the Guttmacher Institute. In 2008, 1.21 million abortions were performed, with about 40 percent of unintended pregnancies now being terminated by abortion.
"Abortion yields 37 percent of all Planned Parenthood revenues by conservative estimates," Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) said in an interview, according to a written statement released by her office. "
This is so redundant.
Could people please realize that there's a lot more than abortions going on.
STD checks, pelvic exams, etc.
Money is brought up once again:
An agency statement says 3 percent of their services are devoted to abortion. They didn't break out the revenue. They also claim to prevent more than half-a-million unintended pregnancies each year by distributing contraceptives. They estimate their efforts prevent 290,000 abortions each year.
Yes this blog post is using the CBS report, because the report from CBS was the most informative out of all the sources reporting on this.
And now we have this:
"Ayotte said he was also worried about a recent "sting" operation by the antiabortion group Live Action, in which men posing as pimps were videotaped interacting with Planned Parenthood workers.
"I'm troubled by what's come out in the videos that have shown that they were essentially looking the other way on sex-trafficking," Ayotte wrote.
Planned Parenthood isn't taking the criticism lying down."
Well, here's what Planned Parenthood has to say. This is the most important piece of this entire post:
"Reasonable people could have agreed on funding the government weeks ago, but a small group of extremists has been allowed to hold the government hostage to their narrow political agenda - one that has no place in the budget process," Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards said in a written statement. "It is truly unacceptable that a small group with an extreme political agenda is forcing a shutdown of the United States government over a dangerous proposal that would bar women from getting the lifesaving health care they need - breast exams, Pap tests, HIV tests and more."
Since this is a blog post and not an article objectivity doesn't need to be an issue; because it is going to be annoying how many skim this post and just think oh well all they do is abortions and take money. Negative, negative, negative.
Go for it, complain it should be a state by state thing and not a federal thing, but guess what? Until states do it themselves the Feds NEED to. If each state was doing this then the Federal Government shut down wouldn't be such a big deal. So many conservatives say they believe things should be "up to the state." Well guess what, the states haven't done it yet, and in regards to the other shut downs I think that it would be better to have the clean water act that the federal government has to contribute and fund rather than having nothing at all. Yes, leave it to the states, but until the states do anything people are getting screwed.
And the people who are screwed might need to go to Planned Parenthood and get that checked out.